Skip to content
Enjoy complimentary data migration when switching from your existing bookkeeper or CPA to Institution.
Bank activity and transaction review

Clarify a charge described by a payment processor

Identify the underlying purchase when the bank text names an intermediary.

Updated 2026-11-11

A bank description can name a payment processor instead of the supplier that provided the goods or service. When a clarification asks what the payment was for, identify the underlying transaction using the supporting record.

  1. Compare the bank date and amount with the receipt or invoice.
  2. Identify the supplier, item or service, and business purpose supported by that document.
  3. Answer the current clarification question with those facts, then review the resulting account proposal.

Do not categorize the intermediary by name alone

The same processor can handle unrelated merchants and payment types. A familiar processor label therefore does not establish that every charge belongs in the same ledger account.

For example, a supported reply could explain that the processor collected a monthly design-software subscription from a named supplier. Use the actual facts of your payment rather than copying that example as an account recommendation. If the receipt covers several items or the amount does not match, resolve that difference before giving a confident answer. Save the reply only when it addresses the current question. The explanation helps refine a suggestion, while the final account choice and any import or posting action remain separate review steps.

Was this article helpful?

Tell us whether this answered the question you came with.

Related articles

Still stuck?

Tell us what you were trying to do and where it went wrong. If you are already a client, you can also open a support case from Help and support in your workspace.

We confirm who you are before we change anything on an account.