An authorized reviewer can be offered Return reversal for a pending request made by another user. Use it when the proposed correction needs different evidence, a corrected date, or a clearer explanation before posting.
- Open the pair and read the original and reversal evidence.
- Choose Return reversal from Reversal action when available.
- Enter the specific reason for returning the request and confirm the resulting state.
Make the next review actionable
Explain the missing or incorrect fact rather than writing only rejected. A useful return reason tells the requester what to check, such as the wrong recorded leg or an unsupported reversal date.
Returning a request does not itself post the reversal or move money at the bank. Inspect the pair afterward so you understand which accounting remains in force. If you are the requester, the workflow may offer cancellation instead of the reviewer return action. Respect the current role-based choices rather than attempting to operate through another person’s session. Once the issue is resolved, the supported next request should contain the corrected evidence and reason. Keep the original source and journal history connected so a later reviewer can follow why the first proposal was returned.
Was this article helpful?
Tell us whether this answered the question you came with.