Document the resource the business actually received
Government assistance can arrive as land, equipment or another resource without an ordinary supplier invoice. Obtain the transfer agreement and identify what rights the business received, when those rights arose and which obligations remain. A permission to use property and an outright transfer may require different analysis even if staff describe both as a donated asset.
Ask the accounting reviewer to confirm the arrangement falls within IAS 20 and identify the applicable asset standard. The absence of a cash payment does not establish that there is nothing to record. Equally, the presence of equipment on site does not by itself prove ownership or the appropriate recognition date.
References: IFRS Foundation: IAS 20 government grants; IFRS Foundation: IAS 16 property, plant and equipment
Keep use conditions attached to the asset record
List any permitted-use requirements, operating commitments, transfer restrictions or return provisions from the agreement. Assign each condition to someone who can monitor it. A restriction stored only in the grant application may be missed later when the asset team considers moving or selling the item.
Reconcile the physical asset to the agreement using location, description, serial details or land references as applicable. Record condition and readiness evidence. If several items arrive under one award, keep the population complete without inventing a cost split merely to populate mandatory fields in the accounting application.
Approve the measurement and presentation policies
IAS 20 describes fair-value measurement for nonmonetary grants and assets, with a nominal-amount alternative. Asset-related grant presentation also requires a policy decision. Have the accountant select and document the approach appropriate to the reporting requirements, applying it consistently rather than choosing the amount that produces the preferred result this year.
Where a valuation is needed, retain the valuation date, asset condition, significant assumptions and scope. A grantor's public announcement of a project's total value may include services or items the company did not receive. Ask for supporting detail and identify missing information instead of using the announced total as a substitute for asset-specific evidence.
References: New Zealand XRB: NZ IAS 20 recognition, assets and repayments
Maintain the grant and asset schedules together
Link the approved grant record to the asset register and relevant ledger accounts. Show how the chosen presentation affects the asset balance, any deferred amount and later income or depreciation. The accounting team should be able to reconcile the schedules even when no purchase-payment transaction exists in the bank feed.
Consider an illustrative equipment transfer that includes two units and a requirement to retain them at a specified site. The handover record should identify both units and their actual condition. If only one unit is operational, the accountant needs that fact before approving the schedules. The award's signing date alone cannot answer every recognition or readiness question.
Review a proposed disposal before removing the asset
Give the grant owner notice of relocation, disposal or a change in the funded activity. Obtain required approvals and an assessment of any repayment or return consequence. Preserve the original transfer evidence and subsequent permissions, so a register cleanup cannot accidentally erase a continuing obligation attached to an apparently free asset.
Sources
Requirements and product details can change. Check the linked guidance for the facts that apply to your situation.
Related reading
Need help with this work?
General information, not personalized accounting, tax, legal, or investment advice. Have the appropriate qualified professional review decisions that depend on your circumstances.