Skip to content
Enjoy complimentary data migration when switching from your existing bookkeeper or CPA to Institution.

Comparisons

Pilot vs Acuity: bookkeeping, controller, and CFO scope

Compare Pilot and Acuity on bookkeeping packages, controller review, tax preparation, CFO work, implementation, and the boundaries between finance roles.

By Institution2 minute readPublished View sources
In this guide

Compare the levels of work you require

Pilot publishes bookkeeping, tax, and CFO offerings. Acuity publishes bookkeeping, controller, tax, and CFO services. A useful comparison identifies the level of preparation, review, and advice your company needs in each area.

An accounting basis, account count, and reporting deadline provide a better starting brief than a generic request for finance help. Add the transactions that need judgment, such as inventory, prepayments, loans, or customer credits. Ask which role handles them in each proposal.

Service models at a glance

Service models at a glance
ProviderPublished service modelScope to confirm
PilotPackaged bookkeeping with separate finance servicesBookkeeping, tax, and CFO offerings
AcuityModular outsourced finance servicesBookkeeping, controller, tax, and CFO services

References: Pilot: published services; Acuity: published services

Locate the controller boundary

Request a responsibility map for reconciliations, adjustments, policies, and final report approval. If a service includes bookkeeping but not controller-level review, identify who makes the remaining accounting decisions. Do not infer review depth from a job title alone.

Use a customer deposit as a test. Ask how the team identifies the obligation, supports the balance, and changes treatment when the underlying work is completed. The answer should refer to the actual facts and reporting requirements rather than automatically classify every receipt as revenue.

Check the path from records to advice

For tax preparation, specify the return list and the handoff of approved balances. For CFO work, specify models, assumptions, meeting cadence, and follow-up. A tax or advisory engagement may use information prepared by a different team.

Ask how corrections move through all affected outputs. A changed balance may alter a tax schedule, management metric, or forecast. The engagement should identify who coordinates that change and how management learns which version is approved.

Compare implementation and recurring scope

Price cleanup, onboarding, ongoing accounting, controller support, tax, CFO services, and software. Check the process for additional work and the responsibilities retained by your staff. Quote the required combination rather than comparing unrelated entry offers.

Before signing, review a sample close and a deliverable from any advisory scope. Agree the records you retain when leaving, including schedules, definitions, assumptions, and open questions. Choose the proposal that makes the required review and communication practical month after month.

Sources

Requirements and product details can change. Check the linked guidance for the facts that apply to your situation.

Related reading

Need help with this work?

General information, not personalized accounting, tax, legal, or investment advice. Have the appropriate qualified professional review decisions that depend on your circumstances.