Skip to content
Enjoy complimentary data migration when switching from your existing bookkeeper or CPA to Institution.

Comparisons

Pilot vs Graphite Financial: packages and integrated finance

Compare Pilot and Graphite Financial on bookkeeping, tax, FP&A, operational support, reporting ownership, implementation, and the complete first-year scope.

By Institution2 minute readPublished View sources
In this guide

Decide how much of finance you want to transfer

Pilot publishes bookkeeping with separate tax and finance offerings. Graphite Financial describes an integrated startup team spanning accounting, FP&A, tax, payroll, and HR. Compare the work each proposal transfers from your staff, rather than assuming one model is always broader or more economical.

A founder who needs reliable monthly accounts may buy a different scope from a leadership team seeking planning and operational administration. List the roles already covered internally. Price only the work that needs a new owner, while making the handoffs to existing staff explicit.

Service models at a glance

Service models at a glance
ProviderPublished service modelScope to confirm
PilotPackaged bookkeeping with separate finance servicesBookkeeping, tax, and CFO offerings
Graphite FinancialIntegrated startup finance teamAccounting, FP&A, tax, payroll, and HR

References: Pilot: published services; Graphite Financial: published services

Compare the accounting-to-planning connection

Ask how a closed month reaches the financial model and how corrections are handled. The proposal should identify who approves actuals, updates assumptions, explains variances, and supports management meetings. Those tasks can sit in different service lines.

Use a revised hiring plan as an example. Ask what information the team needs about start dates, compensation, payroll costs, and collection timing. A useful model separates supported balances from uncertain future activity so management can see what drives the result.

Clarify the operational scope

If you want payroll administration, bill processing, or HR support, name the activities and approval responsibilities. Ask which software stays in place and whether another implementation project is required. A general operations offering does not establish authority to release payments or make employment decisions.

Also define the tax work by entity and filing type. Check who prepares returns, reviews them, obtains authorization, and handles notices. Keep the accounting and professional-service boundaries visible even when one provider coordinates several teams.

Compare recurring costs after implementation

Separate onboarding, cleanup, recurring accounting, FP&A, tax, software, and optional operations. Ask about capacity limits and exceptional events. A package starting price and an integrated custom quote become comparable only after the same deliverables are specified.

Request a month-end package and a sample planning output with confidential data removed. Agree exports for the ledger, supporting schedules, definitions, and model assumptions. Choose the relationship that matches the operating routine you intend to maintain after the initial setup.

Sources

Requirements and product details can change. Check the linked guidance for the facts that apply to your situation.

Related reading

Need help with this work?

General information, not personalized accounting, tax, legal, or investment advice. Have the appropriate qualified professional review decisions that depend on your circumstances.